Posts Tagged ‘live streaming’

Flush with $38 million in financing, Aereo, the startup that brings the TV antenna to the internet is expanding to 22 cities in the USA after launching in New York City.

Aereo connects local TV broadcast signals to I.P. enabled devices such as computers, tablets and smart phones so viewers can watch local TV anywhere including NBC, CBS, ABC a host of other channels, anything that is transmitted via local broadcast signals. No word yet on if Aereo is expanding to Canada.

Backed by media veteran Barry Diller, Aereo has the potential to be a disrupter for the cable news business because it offers cheap service, you can watch local TV on most devices,  and it has recording capabilities to boot.

The price for Aereo starts $1 for 24 hours and goes up to $80 a year for the unlimited plan.

 

Increasingly, startups and more established new media companies are gnawing into the revenues of the big cable services providers. Services like Netflix,  Amazon,  and iTunes  provide high quality on demand TV shows and movies.

Now, Aereo, is targeting another niche local TV. So, theoretically unless you are die hard sports fan (ESPN), you can get your local news, broadcast shows, a lot of big ticket sports, through a combination servies like Aereo and, say Netflix.

Understandably, broadcasters are not happy and the big broadcasters supported by the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) have filed a lawsuit claiming copyright infringement.

The position of Aereo in all of this is summed up CEO Chet Kanojia   “What is at stake is whether a consumer’s right to access broadcast television for free, via an antenna and to record that content for private use, is still meaningful.  If consumers cannot take advantage of current and innovative technology, that right becomes hollow.

There are certain things we take for granted as Americans. One of those things is free access to over-the-air broadcast television and the ability to record and watch our programs.”

Aereo uses an ingenious (its critics would say diabolical) technology that leverages a “micro-antenna” for each user (somewhat similar to a home antenna) thereby getting around the notion of “sharing” broadcast signals. An initial ruling said Aereo could continue to operate despite the lawsuit which ultimately lead to the $38 million in series B financing, and now to Wednesday’s expansion announcement.

Kanojia told Bloomberg news that once it successfully expands in the USA it plans to hit global markets, presumably Canada.

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare

There has been a lot of talk lately about the emergence of Hulu as the next big thing in online video, with some pointing out that though Hulu is small its ultimate business model may be more viable.

More viable because it has licenced content, it is doing deals, it is easier to monetize the video and so on.  All valid points but what people don’t talk about is that Youtube and Hulu fulfil very distinct audience needs.

Hulu is more a lean back experience, and experience that I mostly will do by myself, watching an episode of Battlestar Gallactica  before I crash.

Youtube actually is much more social. I have seen my nephew hanging  out with his friends, each taking turns driving youtube with their wireless keboard in front of a big LCD display. They were at it for what seemed like hours. I myself did it the other night with a few friends and it was a blast, digging up wicked bollywood videos, crazy japanese dancehall footage, the list goes on – we laughed, we cringed, we cried (OK we didn’t cry).

Youtube it seems is trying to leverage this type of behaviour with Realtime.

Youtube says with Realtime  you can

  • See a list of friends currently online and what they are watching
  • See a history of friends’ recent activities
  • Receive real-time notifications when friends perform an activity on the site (such as comment, favorite, etc.

Creating that social layer is a direction that makes sense for Youtube the question is what impact will that have on its monetization strategy?

In fact, Youtube has many questions that need to be answered.

What should Live video streaming strategy should Youtube have? It is clearly on thier radar, with recent a partnership with Ustream, a live video streaming service.

What should youtube do about Long form video considering it is viewed by many as a place for short form content?

What implications do any these decsions have on their bandwidth costs with must be through the roof?

Is the Youtube design just too clunky? Consider Hulu has a super slick interface.

What about search? Youtube’s search isn’t the greatest, odd considering it is owned by Google.

Indeed, Youtube has many, many outstanding issues. Hulu by contrast seems more focused. It will be intresting to see how all of this shakes out, considering in the world of online video Youtube  is the sleeping elephant in the room – and you don’t want to be next to it when it rolls over.

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare