Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Update: Solterra is also developing a condo complex in Chinatown, according to The Tyee.

The Solterra Facebook page is now thoroughly dominated by comments about The Waldorf closing. Here are a selection:

“If anything happens to the precious architectural treasure that is the Waldorf Tiki Room, I hope the ghost of my dear friend Jim Green haunts you until the end of your days. Don’t worry, I can repost this comment as many times as I need to if you’re taking it down. “LOVE, LAUGHTER AND HAPPINESS!! 2013 IS GOING TO BE A GREAT YEAR…” you forgot to add “UNLESS YOU CARE ABOUT ANYTHING BUT MONEY!”

Apart from any kind of comment I would have to make about the Waldorf and how important it is to this city – gotta tell y”ou, I’m FULL of schadenfreude. This is the worst public relations gaffe any developer in this city has EVER made. Let me tell you – as someone looking to get into the market within 5 years, anything you just built is now unsaleable – and I’ll ensure every other young professional I know is aware that Solterra is the one tearing down the Waldorf.”

“FOUR distinct venues under one roof. Sixty employees soon to be out of work. Possibly the oldest surviving Tiki Room in North America. Built in 1947, and lovingly restored since 2010 by the current establishment. More style and dignity than another sub-par condo development selling its suites to absentee, off-shore owners just waiting to flip them for the next flipper. … What- you weren’t expecting Vancouverites to be able to afford these suites, were you?”

Previous Story

The news that The Waldorf Hotel in Vancouver is being sold to a developer has triggered outrage on social media. The hash tag #RIPWaldorf at the time of this post was the number one Twitter Trend in Vancouver, according to the tracking service TrendsMap.

In fact, virtually all the popular hash tags and search terms on Twitter in Vancouver were related to the story of  The Waldorf, a popular cultural and social hub, being sold.

But beyond the noise on Twitter, Mayor Gregor Robertson, Vision Vancouver and the developer Solterra are all  likely preparing for some serious blowback.

News in the digital age outpaces the ability of politicians and organizations to respond to public sentiment which is expressed instantly and loudly.

Case in point: According to a Vancouver Sun blog post by Jeff Lee, Solterra was listed as an attendee for a Vision Vancouver fund raiser in November of 2011. Having said that, Solterra had just one of 88 tables at that fund raiser. The crowd their was an eclectic mix including, W2 media, Artists for Vision, and LGBT Friends of Vision Outlooks TV.

But the fact that Solterra was there is now being re-tweeted, and will just add to the tempest.

The initial response from the mayor’s office and their subsequent, and almost immediate back-pedalling, is documented below. The developer Solterra is not being sparred either as its Facebook page is being inundated with messages.

Check out the response on social media to news of The Waldorf Hotel in Vancouver being sold to condo developers.


 

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare

Now that brands have to ability to customize their Facebook Cover Photo, TV News outlets are starting to leverage this prominent piece of real estate to push their news brands – and so far most of the attempts are, well, lame.

Kim Wilson of the Social News Desk, has a post on Mashable  that survey’s the TV Newsroom Facebook Photo Cover Landscape.  The article points out that TV Newsrooms showcase either the News Team (group photo), the Main Anchors (at the news desk photo), the location (scenic photo), or technology (a photo of the news helicopter). This image from CTV Toronto is par for the course for Facebook News Cover Photos.

Ms. Wilson’s critique of the branded photos was gentle. She writes “It’s a great way to highlight the great lengths (or heights) news organizations go to for news coverage. But beware; these images lack a certain personal touch that fans desire.”

Let me be more blunt the branded photos being displayed are awful . Having worked in the local TV News space the shameless recycling of conventional tropes (such as the smiling anchor, the ready for action chopper) would be disheartening were it not for those same tropes being a source for Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert who blast those conventions with mocking delight.

The images in the article are awful for a simple reason they are examples of “shameless hucksterism.”  Rather than leverage the Facebook Photo Cover as an opportunity to engage with their audiences these photos really are bad wallpaper.

Here are 2 things a TV News Departments could do:

1) Celebrate  your Audience- Rather than push your brand to an audience, pull in your audience – Create a cross-channel photo contest where user submitted photos occupy the cover photo on a News stations Facebook page for a designated amount of time.

2) Humanize Your Talent – It is vital for Local TV News anchors and reporters to be seen as part their community. Leverage community orientated imagery – Have anchors and reporters take pictures of their pets or some of their favorite spots in city- anything besides the highly contrived images that litter the TV News marketing landscape.

 

Facebook Guideline For Branded Photos

“All covers are public. This means that anyone who visits your Page will be able to see your cover. Covers can’t be deceptive, misleading, or infringe on anyone else’s copyright. You may not encourage people to upload your cover to their personal timelines.

Covers may not include:
i.    price or purchase information, such as “40% off” or “Download it on socialmusic.com”;
ii.    contact information such as a website address, email, mailing address, or information that should go in your Page’s “About” section;
iii.    references to Facebook features or actions, such as “Like” or “Share” or an arrow pointing from the cover photo to any of these features; or
iv.    calls to action, such as “Get it now” or “Tell your friends.”

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare

Photos

Netflix Coming To Canada

Netflix Coming To Canada

see larger image

uploaded by Sudha Krishna

Netflix Launch In Canada Signals Seismic Shift In Canadian Media Industry 

The popular on-demand TV and Movie streaming service, Netflix, is coming to Canada.

<!– –>

Canadian Netflix members will be able to instantly watch a broad array of movies and TV episodes right on their TVs via a range of consumer electronics devices capable of streaming from Netflix, as well as watching on PCs and Macs.

In addition to representing its inaugural international market, Canada will also mark the first streaming-only service promoted by Netflix.  

<!– –>

This is the first expansion for Netflix outside of its home base in the United States. At first, content will only be available in English but Netflix said it will be adding French language services soon after the launch in the autumn of 2010.

Though Netflix does provide DVD deliveries in the USA, in Canada, Netflix will be a “streaming only service.”

The news of Netflix’s  launch in Canada should have Canadian broadcasters and the cable and tele-communication companies that own them, worried.

Netflix provides an on-demand service for high quality TV shows and movies without the high cost and hassle of paying for channels, and channel bundles that cable companies offer.

Other companies like Hulu Plus, Apple iTunes Video all operate in this space, all are gradually eating away at the revenue model of cable companies. 

The market in the USA for these services is small but growing fast, very fast – the people who are making the shift to watching TV content online are sometimes called cord cutters. Right there are an estimated 600,000 cord cutters in the United States with that number expected double in 2010.

<!– –>

Cord cutters don’t yet represent a serious threat to the $84 billion cable/satellite/telco TV access industry, which counts an estimated 101 million subscribers. But they are a leading indicator of the shift to TV viewing on the Web. The cord-cutters make up less than 3 percent of all full-episode viewing on the Web. The rest comes from people who are only beginning to watch occasionally online. An estimated 17 percent of the total weekly viewing audience watch at least one or two episodes of a full-length TV show online. Last year, that percentage was 12 percent, and next year it is forecast to grow to 21 percent.

<!– –>

 

Plus, Netflex delivers content to multiple devices including iPhone, the iPad, Xbox, Mac’s, PC’s and of course flat screen TV’s.


But all these on demand streaming services have been unavailable in Canada, until now.

Canadian broadcasters rely for much of their profits on U.S. television shows bought usually every year in Los Angeles. 

Telecommunication companies like Roger’s, Shaw, and Bell all own Canadian TV stations of one kind or another, and they too want to deliver that content, and deliver it to multiple devices just like Netflix but they are big ships often slow to roll out easy-to-use innovative products and services.

Judging by Netflix’s services which I have tried in the USA, Netflix is smaller, more agile, and more in tune with customer needs than bulky, plodding cable and TV companies in Canada.

The TV companies should be particularly worried after all, they are completely dependent on U.S. television shows for the majority of their revenues – revenues that are dependent on an old terrestrial model that simply made money by running Canadian advertisement against U.S. sitcoms, dramas, and movies within Canada. 

For decades it has been like that for media executives in Canada – But some American TV shows, run some Canadian spots against them – and count the cash.

Increasingly, that model is being challenged. 

If media executives don’t figure out how to adapt in this fast changing market the product their peddling on TV may well be available elsewhere online, on mobile, on TV, directly streamed from the United States, with a level convenience and cost that may have Canadians the cutting cord on domestic cable companies thereby cutting the cord on the entire Canadian Media Industry.

That sort of seismic shift won’t come in the form of a dramatic earthquake rather the change will occur like erosion over time.

No, the answer is not to complain to the CRTC to keep Netflix out of Canada.

Netflix has an Canadian email sign up form for Canadians interested in receiving its streaming service.

Tags: | | | | |

Be the first to like.
SlashdotBeboFacebookNowPublicDiggPingTumblrTwitterLinkedInRedditDeliciousStumbleUponTechnorati FavoritesYahoo BookmarksFriendFeedFarkShare